Authoritarian Leadership Style and Psychological Safety: Differences Between In-person and Remote Workers
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This study systematically reviews the literature on the relationship between authoritarian leadership and psychological safety in remote and in-person work. The study delves into the dynamics of leadership style and work setting, aiming to explain how authoritarian leadership can affect psychological safety across these two work settings. Further, it explores how authoritarian leaders can impact psychological safety by thoroughly analyzing the differences and similarities between remote and in-person workers. The review did show that authoritarian leadership is consistently associated with lower psychological safety in the workplace, and employees under this type of leadership tend to report increased levels of fear, stress, and apprehension about expressing their opinions or concerns. The effects may increase in remote work, where the dependency on virtual communication can amplify perceptions of control and dominance. Overall, this review aims to highlight leadership's role in fostering communication, trust, and a sense of belonging, which are crucial for building an environment of psychological safety in any work setting. The implications of this empirical review provide a thorough understanding of the challenges posed by authoritarianism on psychological safety, offering a clear understanding that organizations can provide support and help improve the well-being and performance of employees.
Description
item.page.type
Thesis
item.page.format
Keywords
Authoritarian Leadership, Psychological Safety, Telecommuting, Performance